
Is it the zodiac or the manner in which two people manage the conflict when a relationship seems to be doomed even in the beginning?
A compatibility found in the astrology can be the reflection of the differences which a couple already feels: the speed, privacy, spontaneity, emotional intensity and the thoughts on the commitment. Its usefulness to many readers is not so much prediction as naming some of the common points of friction before they become hardened into a pattern of marriage-wide friction.
A single piece of evidence can explain why some matches are so explosive. Dr. John Gottman had come up with criticism, contempt, defensiveness and stonewalling as patterns of communication that are consistently reliable in pointing out marital instability when they become the default pattern in the couple. The what of a mismatch is frequently discussed in astrology talk; relationship research is useful in describing the how of how it fails in everyday situations.

1. Aries & Cancer
This coupleing clashes regularly on the emotional pacing level. Aries prefers to move fast and talk straight, whereas Cancer prefers to be reassured, safe, and emotionally sensitive. Aries may sound dismissive but not off-putting, Cancer may recede, and Aries would feel a lockout.
In the long run, the discussion might drift away on the question of the problem itself and towards image judgments one partner as too sensitive, the other too harsh. When such a dynamic recurs, it fits the warning signs of Gottman criticism and defensiveness intensify, stonewalling is an attempted escape exit.

2. Taurus & Aquarius
Two fixed signs may make differences move to immovable positions. Taurus usually values routines, stability and predictable investments in domestic life. Aquarius has a tendency of valuing autonomy, creativity, and innovative ways of doing things.
The chronic negotiator is not just disagreement; it is a long-term stressor. Freedom-seeking might be understood as unreliability by Taurus and structure as control by Aquarius. The deeper both parties entrench themselves, the further they get in the line of having a set of power positions instead of mutual planning.

3. Gemini & Virgo
The two signs have a Mercurial and mental orientation but in different ways. Gemini tends to process life in a variety of ways, experimentation and quick attention changes. Virgo is a stress coping style that focused on order, details and improvement.
In normal life Virgo can interpret the flexibility of Gemini as its inconsistency; Gemini can feel its standards of Virgo as its continual correction. When the repair efforts of the couple become lost, the dialogue begins to seem as though it were an audit- a perfect environment in which criticism and defensiveness should become a matter of course and not of sporadic occurrence.

4. Leo & Scorpio
This game has often been called hard – and intensity can hold together, until it becomes a competition. Leo is usually an extrovert, who functions well in terms of visibility, appreciation and expressive affection. Scorpios tend to treasure their privacy, loyalty and emotional restraint.
As the security plans of each partner conflict, Leo going out to find confirmation and Scorpio going in to seek assurance, one can bring in jealousy and suspicion. When one partner starts to view the needs of the other as a fault rather than a difference, then the conflict risk increases and this is where contempt is bound to creep in.

5. Virgo & Sagittarius
Virgo can be so stabilizing and dependable that it becomes down-to-earth to Sagittarius with his freedom, motion, and spontaneity being the key element. Sagittarius can be perceived by Virgo as careless and Virgo as restrictive.
Marriage strain usually revolves around lifestyle issues: schedules/flexibleness, certainty/adventure, planning/improvisation. In case a couple cannot be heard by either partner, constant conflicts are likely to be over identity (this is just who I am), and compromise is going to seem like erasing themselves instead of collaborating.

6. Libra & Capricorn
Libra tends to pursue balance, mutual experiences and interpersonal warmth. Capricorn often values objectives, accountability, and objectives. They both can be very faithful but they might show devotion in a manner that the other fails to perceive.
The emphasis by Capricorn can be understood by Libra as lack of emotion; the social needs of Libra can be understood by Capricorn as a distraction towards a joint insecurity. Everyday incompatibilities, such as time, money habits, and priorities, may build up until the couple ceases to believe in goodwill, a variable that leads the couple to feel that criticism is warranted and repair is unwarranted.

7. Scorpio & Aries
Temperaments under Mars are firey. Aries fights in the open and he values openness and resolution. Scorpio tends to combat on a depth, memory and emotional plan.
Aries can perceive Scorpio as holding back, Scorpio as Aries inattentively using trust. The relationship may get tiring when none of the partners leaves the dominance mode. The arguments do not remain episodic, with no common conflict ritual of cool-downs, apologizing, and boundary-setting, the arguments begin to experience as the primary mode of connection between the relationship.

8. Sagittarius & Cancer
This is a typical conflict between search and nesting. Sagittarius is inclined to appreciate autonomy and harsh sincerity. Cancer generally appreciates emotional security, predictability and a powerful house hold.
When Sagittarius is felt tethered distance increases, when Cancer is insecure pursuit increases. That fault-flight loop may turn into a self-fulfilling cycle with each partner responding to the other as he or she evokes the most dreadful specter of the other, desertion by Cancer, prison by Sagittarius, until neither is left wanting.

9. Capricorn & Aries
They are both cardinal signs who are energized in leadership, but their schedules are not always the same. Capricorn tends to have a long game calculated, tactical, risk conscious. Aries is fast doing things first, care then.
Friction in marriage may accumulate around the decision-making: fastness versus prudence. impulsiveness versus forethought. Aries can be interpreted as negative by Capricorn; Capricorn can be interpreted as Aries reckless. When such interpretations become solid, the couple ceases discussing options and begins discussing competence and maturity, making conflict even more serious than the initial issue.

10. Aquarius & Scorpio
The Scorpio usually wants a strong emotional union and openness. Aquarius tends to be independent and even intellectual in distance. What is not matching is not so much about love, but rather about the appearance of intimacy.
Scorpio can demand confirmation and secrecy; Aquarius can withdraw to maintain his independence. The resulting push-pull may be a challenge of loyalty to Scorpio and a challenge of freedom to Aquarius. A breakdown of the ability of the couple to convert the needs of each other into a common language becomes the cyclical nature of the conflict and the weak position of trust.
The usefulness of astrology can be its wording: it provides a means of couples talking about the differences without blaming each other right away. The more powerful indicator of divorce, however, is the recurrent occurrence of contempt and other destructive conflict patterns patterns that may emerge in any union in the absence of repair, respect and emotional safety cohesion. For couples who recognize themselves in a “difficult match,” the practical question becomes whether disagreements still include kindness, accountability, and recovery. When those remain intact, compatibility becomes less about signs and more about skills.


